Skip to content

Conversation

@tomfuertes
Copy link
Contributor

Refs #489 (specifically #issuecomment-42754794) and updates the preceding paragraph appropriately.

entries/one.xml Outdated
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can drop the comparison to .bind() altogether and instead just have: "The .one() method is identical to .on(), except that…"

Refs #489 (specifically #issuecomment-42754794) and updates the preceding paragraph appropriately.
@tomfuertes
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kswedberg - Love it!

Rebased w/ feedback + removed now redundant second code block.

@kswedberg kswedberg closed this in fd3b18b Jul 10, 2014
@kswedberg
Copy link
Member

Excellent. Thanks for taking care of this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants